fix: enforce allowed-account-ids on all auth paths (#1847)

* fix: enforce allowed-account-ids on all auth paths

The allowed-account-ids list was only enforced in some auth flows. This
was due to the check being included in validateCredentials, which was
skipped if (GITHUB_ACTIONS && AccessKeyId && output-env-credentials) ->
false.

This unifies credential validation into a single path.

- validateCredentials(credentials?, ...) resolves credentials, proves
  liveness via one GetCallerIdentity call, and returns the identity.
- validateAccountId(expectedAccountIds, account) is now a pure comparison
  against the resolved account, enforced against the final (assumed)
  account independent of auth method, GITHUB_ACTIONS, or
  output-env-credentials.
- exportAccountId(identity, ...) consumes the resolved identity instead of
  making its own GetCallerIdentity call, so credential resolution happens
  exactly once per credential set.

Pre-assume account checks remain gated on !roleToAssume so cross-account
assume-role (source account differs from the role's target) is preserved.

Adds regression tests for the OIDC wrong-account case (the previously
missing negative test), OIDC with output-env-credentials: false, and the
assume-role wrong-account case.

* chore: move validateAccountId into helpers
This commit is contained in:
Tom Keller
2026-06-26 13:33:19 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent e004cdcd28
commit 4d281fbc56
5 changed files with 184 additions and 86 deletions
+4 -1
View File
@@ -776,7 +776,10 @@ the environment (for example, on a self-hosted runner where you do not want the
assumed-role credentials to shadow an existing EC2 instance profile), pair
`output-credentials: true` with `output-env-credentials: false`. In that mode,
the action does not run its post-credential SDK-pickup validation step, since
the credentials were never written to the environment.
the credentials were never written to the environment. The action still
validates the resolved credentials by calling `sts:GetCallerIdentity` with the
explicit credentials, so the `allowed-account-ids` check can be enforced if
provided.
### Configure multiple AWS profiles in a single workflow
+34 -33
View File
@@ -53,54 +53,55 @@ export class CredentialsClient {
public get stsClient(): STSClient {
if (!this._stsClient || this.roleChaining) {
this._stsClient = new STSClient({
customUserAgent: buildCustomUserAgent(),
...(this.region !== undefined && { region: this.region }),
...(this.stsEndpoint !== undefined && { endpoint: this.stsEndpoint }),
...(this.requestHandler !== undefined && { requestHandler: this.requestHandler }),
});
this._stsClient = this.createStsClient();
}
return this._stsClient;
}
// Builds an STS client using the action's configured region/endpoint/proxy. When explicit credentials are provided,
// the client uses them directly instead of the SDK default credential provider chain.
// This matters for validateAccountId.
private createStsClient(credentials?: AwsCredentialIdentity): STSClient {
return new STSClient({
customUserAgent: buildCustomUserAgent(),
...(this.region !== undefined && { region: this.region }),
...(this.stsEndpoint !== undefined && { endpoint: this.stsEndpoint }),
...(this.requestHandler !== undefined && { requestHandler: this.requestHandler }),
...(credentials !== undefined && { credentials }),
});
}
// Validates that the credentials the action will hand to subsequent steps actually work, and returns the resolved
// caller identity (account + ARN). "Work" is proven by a sts:GetCallerIdentity call, which both confirms the
// credentials are accepted by AWS and returns the identity for later checks and outputs to use.
public async validateCredentials(
credentials?: AwsCredentialIdentity,
expectedAccessKeyId?: string,
roleChaining?: boolean,
expectedAccountIds?: string[],
) {
let credentials: AwsCredentialIdentity;
try {
credentials = await this.loadCredentials();
if (!credentials.accessKeyId) {
throw new Error('Access key ID empty after loading credentials');
}
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`Credentials could not be loaded, please check your action inputs: ${errorMessage(error)}`);
}
if (expectedAccountIds && expectedAccountIds.length > 0 && expectedAccountIds[0] !== '') {
let callerIdentity: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof getCallerIdentity>>;
): Promise<Awaited<ReturnType<typeof getCallerIdentity>>> {
if (!credentials) {
let resolved: AwsCredentialIdentity;
try {
callerIdentity = await getCallerIdentity(this.stsClient);
resolved = await this.loadCredentials();
if (!resolved.accessKeyId) {
throw new Error('Access key ID empty after loading credentials');
}
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`Could not validate account ID of credentials: ${errorMessage(error)}`);
throw new Error(`Credentials could not be loaded, please check your action inputs: ${errorMessage(error)}`);
}
if (!callerIdentity.Account || !expectedAccountIds.includes(callerIdentity.Account)) {
throw new Error(
`The account ID of the provided credentials (${
callerIdentity.Account ?? 'unknown'
}) does not match any of the expected account IDs: ${expectedAccountIds.join(', ')}`,
);
}
}
if (!roleChaining) {
const actualAccessKeyId = credentials.accessKeyId;
if (expectedAccessKeyId && expectedAccessKeyId !== actualAccessKeyId) {
if (!roleChaining && expectedAccessKeyId && expectedAccessKeyId !== resolved.accessKeyId) {
throw new Error(
'Credentials loaded by the SDK do not match the expected access key ID configured by the action',
);
}
}
const client = credentials ? this.createStsClient(credentials) : this.stsClient;
try {
return await getCallerIdentity(client);
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`Credentials could not be loaded, please check your action inputs: ${errorMessage(error)}`);
}
}
private async loadCredentials() {
+32 -3
View File
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ import * as path from 'node:path';
import * as core from '@actions/core';
import type { Credentials, STSClient } from '@aws-sdk/client-sts';
import { GetCallerIdentityCommand } from '@aws-sdk/client-sts';
import type { AwsCredentialIdentity } from '@aws-sdk/types';
import type { UserAgent } from '@smithy/types';
import type { CredentialsClient } from './CredentialsClient';
@@ -150,9 +151,8 @@ export async function getCallerIdentity(client: STSClient): Promise<{ Account: s
return result;
}
// Obtains account ID from STS Client and sets it as output
export async function exportAccountId(credentialsClient: CredentialsClient, maskAccountId?: boolean) {
const identity = await getCallerIdentity(credentialsClient.stsClient);
// Emits the account ID and ARN of an already-resolved caller identity as action outputs.
export function exportAccountId(identity: { Account: string; Arn: string }, maskAccountId?: boolean) {
const accountId = identity.Account;
const arn = identity.Arn;
if (maskAccountId) {
@@ -164,6 +164,35 @@ export async function exportAccountId(credentialsClient: CredentialsClient, mask
return accountId;
}
// Validates that the account of the already-resolved caller identity is in the allow-list provided via the
// `allowed-account-ids` input.
export function validateAccountId(expectedAccountIds: string[] | undefined, account: string | undefined): void {
if (!expectedAccountIds || expectedAccountIds.length === 0 || expectedAccountIds[0] === '') {
return;
}
if (!account || !expectedAccountIds.includes(account)) {
throw new Error(
`The account ID of the provided credentials (${
account ?? 'unknown'
}) does not match any of the expected account IDs: ${expectedAccountIds.join(', ')}`,
);
}
}
// Converts the STS Credentials shape (returned by AssumeRole and provided as action inputs) into
// the AwsCredentialIdentity shape the SDK expects when credentials are supplied explicitly to a
// client. Returns undefined if the access key ID or secret access key is missing.
export function toCredentialIdentity(creds?: Partial<Credentials>): AwsCredentialIdentity | undefined {
if (!creds?.AccessKeyId || !creds.SecretAccessKey) {
return undefined;
}
return {
accessKeyId: creds.AccessKeyId,
secretAccessKey: creds.SecretAccessKey,
...(creds.SessionToken && { sessionToken: creds.SessionToken }),
};
}
// Tags have a more restrictive set of acceptable characters than GitHub environment variables can.
// This replaces anything not conforming to the tag restrictions by inverting the regular expression.
// See the AWS documentation for constraint specifics https://docs.aws.amazon.com/STS/latest/APIReference/API_Tag.html.
+38 -44
View File
@@ -10,8 +10,10 @@ import {
exportRegion,
getBooleanInput,
retryAndBackoff,
toCredentialIdentity,
translateEnvVariables,
unsetCredentials,
validateAccountId,
verifyKeys,
} from './helpers';
import { writeProfileFiles } from './profileManager';
@@ -51,8 +53,8 @@ export async function run() {
});
const roleChaining = getBooleanInput('role-chaining', { required: false });
const outputCredentials = getBooleanInput('output-credentials', { required: false });
// Default to always outputting environment credentials unless profile is specified. If profile is specified, default to
// no environment credentials (but still output them if the user specifically requests it).
// Default to always outputting environment credentials unless profile is specified. If profile is specified, default
// to no environment credentials (but still output them if the user specifically requests it).
const outputEnvCredentials = getBooleanInput('output-env-credentials', { required: false, default: !awsProfile });
const unsetCurrentCredentials = getBooleanInput('unset-current-credentials', { required: false });
let disableRetry = getBooleanInput('disable-retry', { required: false });
@@ -198,27 +200,38 @@ export async function run() {
writeProfileFiles(awsProfile, { AccessKeyId, SecretAccessKey, SessionToken }, region, overwriteAwsProfile);
}
} else if (!webIdentityTokenFile && !roleChaining) {
// Proceed only if credentials can be picked up
await withRetry(
() => credentialsClient.validateCredentials(undefined, roleChaining, expectedAccountIds),
// Proceed only if credentials can be picked up. validateCredentials resolves the ambient
// credentials via the SDK default chain, proves they work, and returns the caller identity.
const identity = await withRetry(
() => credentialsClient.validateCredentials(undefined, undefined, roleChaining),
'validateCredentials',
);
sourceAccountId = await withRetry(() => exportAccountId(credentialsClient, maskAccountId), 'exportAccountId');
// Enforce the allowed-account-ids guardrail unless a role will be assumed, in which case the
// final account is validated after assumeRole (these ambient credentials are the source account).
if (!roleToAssume) {
validateAccountId(expectedAccountIds, identity.Account);
}
sourceAccountId = exportAccountId(identity, maskAccountId);
}
if (AccessKeyId || roleChaining) {
// Validate that the SDK can actually pick up credentials.
// This validates cases where this action is using existing environment credentials,
// and cases where the user intended to provide input credentials but the secrets inputs resolved to empty strings.
// Skip when output-env-credentials is false: input IAM keys were not written to env, so
// the default chain would resolve to ambient runner credentials and the access-key check
// would spuriously fail (see #1554).
// Validate that the credentials the action will use actually work, and resolve their identity.
const resolutionCredentials =
outputEnvCredentials || !AccessKeyId
? undefined
: toCredentialIdentity({ AccessKeyId, SecretAccessKey, SessionToken });
const identity = await withRetry(
() => credentialsClient.validateCredentials(resolutionCredentials, AccessKeyId, roleChaining),
'validateCredentials',
);
// Enforce the allowed-account-ids guardrail unless a role will be assumed (the final account is
// validated after assumeRole; these are the source credentials).
if (!roleToAssume) {
validateAccountId(expectedAccountIds, identity.Account);
}
sourceAccountId = identity.Account;
if (outputEnvCredentials) {
await withRetry(
() => credentialsClient.validateCredentials(AccessKeyId, roleChaining, expectedAccountIds),
'validateCredentials',
);
sourceAccountId = await withRetry(() => exportAccountId(credentialsClient, maskAccountId), 'exportAccountId');
exportAccountId(identity, maskAccountId);
}
}
if (customTags && (useGitHubOIDCProvider() || webIdentityTokenFile)) {
@@ -252,24 +265,15 @@ export async function run() {
} while (specialCharacterWorkaround && !verifyKeys(roleCredentials.Credentials));
core.info(`Authenticated as assumedRoleId ${roleCredentials.AssumedRoleUser?.AssumedRoleId}`);
exportCredentials(roleCredentials.Credentials, outputCredentials, outputEnvCredentials);
// Validate that the SDK can pick up the assumed-role credentials from the environment.
// Skip when output-env-credentials is false: the credentials were never written to env,
// so the default credential provider chain would resolve to ambient runner credentials
// (e.g. an EC2 instance profile) and the access-key-id check would spuriously fail.
// Skip when using a profile: validation runs after the profile file is written below.
if ((!process.env.GITHUB_ACTIONS || AccessKeyId) && !awsProfile && outputEnvCredentials) {
await withRetry(
() =>
credentialsClient.validateCredentials(
roleCredentials.Credentials?.AccessKeyId,
roleChaining,
expectedAccountIds,
),
'validateCredentials',
);
}
// Validate the assumed-role credentials and resolve their identity.
const identity = await withRetry(
() => credentialsClient.validateCredentials(toCredentialIdentity(roleCredentials.Credentials)),
'validateCredentials',
);
// Enforce the allowed-account-ids guardrail against the assumed (final) account.
validateAccountId(expectedAccountIds, identity.Account);
if (outputEnvCredentials) {
await withRetry(() => exportAccountId(credentialsClient, maskAccountId), 'exportAccountId');
exportAccountId(identity, maskAccountId);
}
// Write profile files if profile mode is enabled
@@ -279,18 +283,8 @@ export async function run() {
}
// If user provided IAM User Credentials and then we assumed a role, overwrite the profile file to add
// the session token. (this only overwrites the profile within a single run of the action).
// We then validate the credentials to make sure they work.
if (AccessKeyId || !process.env.GITHUB_ACTIONS) {
writeProfileFiles(awsProfile, roleCredentials.Credentials, region, true);
await withRetry(
() =>
credentialsClient.validateCredentials(
roleCredentials.Credentials?.AccessKeyId,
roleChaining,
expectedAccountIds,
),
'validateCredentials',
);
} else {
writeProfileFiles(awsProfile, roleCredentials.Credentials, region, overwriteAwsProfile);
}
+76 -5
View File
@@ -618,6 +618,9 @@ describe('Configure AWS Credentials', {}, () => {
});
it("doesn't export credentials as environment variables if told not to", {}, async () => {
mockedSTSClient.on(AssumeRoleWithWebIdentityCommand).resolvesOnce(mocks.outputs.STS_CREDENTIALS);
// Credentials are validated (and their account resolved) even when not exported to the
// environment, so GetCallerIdentity is now called on the explicit assumed-role credentials.
mockedSTSClient.on(GetCallerIdentityCommand).resolves({ ...mocks.outputs.GET_CALLER_IDENTITY });
vi.mocked(core.getInput).mockImplementation(mocks.getInput(mocks.NO_ENV_CREDS_INPUTS));
vi.mocked(core.getIDToken).mockResolvedValue('testoidctoken');
process.env.ACTIONS_ID_TOKEN_REQUEST_TOKEN = 'fake-token';
@@ -628,6 +631,7 @@ describe('Configure AWS Credentials', {}, () => {
});
it('can export creds as step outputs without exporting as env variables', {}, async () => {
mockedSTSClient.on(AssumeRoleWithWebIdentityCommand).resolvesOnce(mocks.outputs.STS_CREDENTIALS);
mockedSTSClient.on(GetCallerIdentityCommand).resolves({ ...mocks.outputs.GET_CALLER_IDENTITY });
vi.mocked(core.getInput).mockImplementation(mocks.getInput(mocks.STEP_BUT_NO_ENV_INPUTS));
vi.mocked(core.getIDToken).mockResolvedValue('testoidctoken');
process.env.ACTIONS_ID_TOKEN_REQUEST_TOKEN = 'fake-token';
@@ -897,6 +901,65 @@ describe('Configure AWS Credentials', {}, () => {
expect(core.info).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Authenticated as assumedRoleId AROAFAKEASSUMEDROLEID');
});
it('fails with OIDC when account ID does not match allowed list', async () => {
// Regression test for the allowed-account-ids bypass: in a real runner (GITHUB_ACTIONS=true)
// authenticating via OIDC, the account-ID guardrail was previously never enforced.
vi.mocked(core.getInput).mockImplementation(
mocks.getInput({
...mocks.GH_OIDC_INPUTS,
'allowed-account-ids': '999999999999',
}),
);
vi.mocked(core.getIDToken).mockResolvedValue('testoidctoken');
mockedSTSClient.on(AssumeRoleWithWebIdentityCommand).resolves(mocks.outputs.STS_CREDENTIALS);
mockedSTSClient.on(GetCallerIdentityCommand).resolves({ ...mocks.outputs.GET_CALLER_IDENTITY });
process.env.ACTIONS_ID_TOKEN_REQUEST_TOKEN = 'fake-token';
await run();
expect(core.setFailed).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'The account ID of the provided credentials (111111111111) does not match any of the expected account IDs: 999999999999',
);
});
it('fails with OIDC and output-env-credentials false when account ID does not match', async () => {
// The guardrail must hold even when credentials are never written to the environment.
vi.mocked(core.getInput).mockImplementation(
mocks.getInput({
...mocks.NO_ENV_CREDS_INPUTS,
'allowed-account-ids': '999999999999',
}),
);
vi.mocked(core.getIDToken).mockResolvedValue('testoidctoken');
mockedSTSClient.on(AssumeRoleWithWebIdentityCommand).resolves(mocks.outputs.STS_CREDENTIALS);
mockedSTSClient.on(GetCallerIdentityCommand).resolves({ ...mocks.outputs.GET_CALLER_IDENTITY });
process.env.ACTIONS_ID_TOKEN_REQUEST_TOKEN = 'fake-token';
await run();
expect(core.setFailed).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'The account ID of the provided credentials (111111111111) does not match any of the expected account IDs: 999999999999',
);
});
it('fails with assume role when assumed account ID does not match allowed list', async () => {
vi.mocked(core.getInput).mockImplementation(
mocks.getInput({
...mocks.IAM_ASSUMEROLE_INPUTS,
'allowed-account-ids': '999999999999',
}),
);
mockedSTSClient.on(AssumeRoleCommand).resolves(mocks.outputs.STS_CREDENTIALS);
mockedSTSClient.on(GetCallerIdentityCommand).resolves({ ...mocks.outputs.GET_CALLER_IDENTITY });
// biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny: any required to mock private method
vi.spyOn(CredentialsClient.prototype as any, 'loadCredentials')
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ accessKeyId: 'MYAWSACCESSKEYID' })
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ accessKeyId: 'STSAWSACCESSKEYID' });
await run();
expect(core.setFailed).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'The account ID of the provided credentials (111111111111) does not match any of the expected account IDs: 999999999999',
);
});
it('handles GetCallerIdentity API failure gracefully', async () => {
vi.mocked(core.getInput).mockImplementation(
mocks.getInput({
@@ -911,7 +974,11 @@ describe('Configure AWS Credentials', {}, () => {
});
await run();
expect(core.setFailed).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Could not validate account ID of credentials: API Error');
// The account allow-list now reuses the single liveness GetCallerIdentity call, so an STS
// failure surfaces as a credential-loading failure rather than a dedicated account-check error.
expect(core.setFailed).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'Credentials could not be loaded, please check your action inputs: API Error',
);
});
it('ignores validation when allowed-account-ids is empty', async () => {
@@ -1373,7 +1440,7 @@ describe('Configure AWS Credentials', {}, () => {
});
describe('Retry Behavior', {}, () => {
it('retries exportAccountId on transient GetCallerIdentity failure', async () => {
it('retries validateCredentials on transient GetCallerIdentity failure', async () => {
vi.mocked(core.getInput).mockImplementation(mocks.getInput(mocks.IAM_USER_INPUTS));
// biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny: any required to mock private method
vi.spyOn(CredentialsClient.prototype as any, 'loadCredentials').mockResolvedValue({
@@ -1384,7 +1451,9 @@ describe('Configure AWS Credentials', {}, () => {
.rejectsOnce(new Error('throttled'))
.resolves({ ...mocks.outputs.GET_CALLER_IDENTITY });
await run();
expect(core.info).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Retry exportAccountId'));
// The single liveness GetCallerIdentity call lives in validateCredentials, so transient STS
// failures are retried under that label (the account ID is then resolved without a second call).
expect(core.info).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Retry validateCredentials'));
expect(core.setFailed).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
@@ -1414,7 +1483,7 @@ describe('Configure AWS Credentials', {}, () => {
expect(core.info).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Retry'));
});
it('retries exportAccountId after role assumption (issue #1681)', async () => {
it('retries the post-assume identity check on a transient invalid-token error (issue #1681)', async () => {
vi.mocked(core.getInput).mockImplementation(mocks.getInput(mocks.GH_OIDC_INPUTS));
vi.mocked(core.getIDToken).mockResolvedValue('testoidctoken');
mockedSTSClient.on(AssumeRoleWithWebIdentityCommand).resolves(mocks.outputs.STS_CREDENTIALS);
@@ -1424,7 +1493,9 @@ describe('Configure AWS Credentials', {}, () => {
.resolves({ ...mocks.outputs.GET_CALLER_IDENTITY });
process.env.ACTIONS_ID_TOKEN_REQUEST_TOKEN = 'fake-token';
await run();
expect(core.info).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Retry exportAccountId'));
// Freshly-assumed credentials can be briefly rejected by STS (eventual consistency). The
// liveness GetCallerIdentity now runs inside validateCredentials, so the retry happens there.
expect(core.info).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Retry validateCredentials'));
expect(core.info).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.stringContaining('The security token included in the request is invalid'),
);